Have you ever noticed how proud liberals are? They're always parading around their beliefs, like they're something to be proud of. Nothing is more apparent then their desire to give pedophiles an advantage over children.
Let's talk about the age of consent. The law should be universal in every state, you must be 18 years of age to have sex. End of story. Liberals are constantly fighting on the side of pedophiles to lower it down. A lot of states have the age of consent at a disgusting 16 years old. Take a look at gay Canada, children as young as 14 can have sex with 40 year old men legally. What is the world coming to?
Well, it's no secret how much I hate the ACLU. Some people say to me, "how can you hate an organization that fights for your rights?" Hmmm, let's see. The ACLU defends pedophiles. How's that for a reason? The ACLU has fought for child pornography. "The ACLU's position is this: criminalize the production but legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography."
The ACLU also defended NAMBLA. NAMBLA stands for the North America Man Boy Love Association. It is a group of pedophiles trying to get the age of consent to be lowered, probably to 6 years of age. How can anyone with a conscience defend such a group? They're organized pedophiles trying to legalize having sex with children. What kind of America is this?
Lastly the ACLU fought and won to destroy the Child Online Protections Act. All the act would have done is made pornographic websites take an extra step to prevent children from looking at pornographic images. Simple. The ACLU ruined it because they believe free speech includes a right for a 9 year old to look at pornography.
I'm done with this post. Liberals are sick.
Support Conservatipedia
Liberals Are Pedophiles
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
29 comments:
Your site sucks. Goto hell!
18 for sex? You had a sad life in high school huh?
Just so you are aware, "pedophilia" refers to a condition wherein adults wish to engage in sexual relations with children, specifically youths who are pre-pubescent. As, in your post, you speak only of lowering the age of consent to 16 (or 14 in Canada), in which instance the "children" in question would be, one imagines, pubescent, describing liberals as "pedophiles" is largely inaccurate.
So, while it may be, by your reckoning, wrong or even immoral to lower the age of consent, it is not, technically speaking, "pedophilia", semantic as that distinction may be.
For tens of thousands of years (including most of the Bible), humans married and were fathers and mothers by 15 or so. 18 as the age of consent is a modern construction. 13 was the historical transition into "adulthood." When you rant, it's usually a good idea to get your facts straight.
About 50% of Americans have sex before 16 years of age. tard.
You can just see plainly how much hate exists in the hearts of libs.
stop asking me for a bigger penis
The ACLU defends people who believe their rights have been taken away. They don't care who you are or what you represent. Everyone no matter if you agree with them or not has rights. You're not allowed to pick and choose who gets rights and who doesn't.
I bet they would even help you out if you needed them. Isn't that amazing.
You say that it shouldn't be up to the states to set their own age of consent? How is that conservative? Do you want big brother to decide you communist!
Also, if liberal dems are the pedophiles, where are all the left wing scandals involving pages? Where are the bathroom foot tapping scandals? Face it, if anyone is a pedophile, its the right wing, not the liberals.
I'm done with this post, right wingers are sick perverts who project their own problems onto the other side of the political spectrum.
raving loon! get lost!
As a confirmed atheist, I must reluctantly that Conservatopedia has absolutely flawless logic and is absolutely right. All liberals are pedophiles, and all pedophiles are liberals. I mean, look at a guy like Warren Jeffs. Here's a perfectly fine upstanding God-fearing Mormon. The leader of one of the most holy communities in our land, a pillar of faith, purity and all that's good about America. But he is persecuted by the liberal media, and the liberal courts, and the liberal prosecutors (who by the way are all child molesters) merely because he an a couple hundred other guys have created a city devoted to the idea that 13 year old boys should be left in a large city with no money in their pocket, while their 13 year old sisters should be married to 40 year old men. Makes me sick to think that Liberals and Canadians would find this behavior illegal or improper. These are actual WEDDINGS people! Sanctified by GOD! It's not pedophilia if you rape your 13 year old WIFE! No matter how many of them you have! I'm going out and buying a bible. Then, I'm voting for Romney.
Dude, you gave me a great bj last week. Keep up the fagtabulous work, honey!
"I love dicks in my butt!"
-Christopher
Hey, I want a dick in my butt too.
Did I mention that I waS JUST RECENTLY converted by a flaming liberal?
ABORTIONS FOR EVERYONE!!!!!!!!
Wow you have no idea about age of consent. Age of consent means at least in my state that if you are 16 you can have sex with someone no more than 4 years older. here is the actual law
"Children Who are less than 16 years of age and the person is four or more years older than the complainant and the complainant and person are not married to each other." Don't assume that the age of consent means someone can have sex at 16 with a 40 year old adult.
Don't assume you know what your talking about when you clearly haven't done your research.
Age of consent is now 16 in Canada and 18 for anal sex.
But y'know, here in gay Canada, we still have our pot-smoking gang-bangs every Sunday. We then burn some crosses and stone people who have worked on Sunday... oh wait, that last part is Christian law, not Canadian.
you know what my favorite part of the bible is? the part where lott whores his underage daughters out to the male populations of soddom if they promise to not have buttsex..
then the punchline is when his wife is turned to salt, he has sex with BOTH of his underage daughters so he can produce offspring and ends up marrying one.
so to make my point - Christians believe
A: sex with underage girls is only ok when one of their parents whores them to you
and B: if they dont whore them to you then the only time its ok is when incest is involved.
kthxbye.
conservative christian fanatic: someone who was able to spew spurious fear before the internet rendered them charlatans.
dinosaur: extinct even before conservative christian fanatic
Love your myspace page. Second friend is a tranny.
kind of extreme, but i like the no-nonsense anti-liberal-ness of this site.
I think you got it wrong. We conservatives are supposed to honor the Bible, right? We're supposed to believe in liberty and the right for states to make their own laws, right? Where in the Bible does it say that you should not have sex before 18? Where in the Constitution (remember that document? It's supposed to lay out the limits of the federal government) does it say the feds have the right to dictate age of consent?
Perhaps we should have the same age of consent you find in the Bible. We should also not condone homosexual sex or sex outside marriage, in agreement with the Word of God. Sound conservative enough for you? Oh, yeah, the Bible doesn't have an age of consent... Just make sure you're married first! :)
You website sucks!!
Liberals are not sick.
LIBERTY MEANS FREEDOM which is what the US flag stands for.
You're not reading your constitution right. Liberals DO NOT say that it is perfectly fine for a 13 yr old to have sex with an adult.
Liberals want to see that the age of concent is lowered not for pedophiles, this is so that when a 16 yr old makes the decition to move out of her drunken mothers house and with her sober 22 year old boyfriend off into a better life she can do so with her own free will having made a better choice for herself. Her boyfriend is not a criminal or pedophile is he?
im a moderate. and what your article said is batshit crazy. pedophilia is not limited to liberals or any group for that matter, look at the Catholic church. You'r entitled to your beliefs, but shitting all over others is something I look down on. ANd gee I wonder how many conservative rednecks are actual pedophiles???
a pedophile and a sex offender are two different things. Pedophiles have sexual desires for pre-pudecent children but don't necsisarilly gave sex with them. While some sex offenders are pedophiles, others arn't. They are simply labeled one because they had sex with a child, pedos ONLY have thoughts about children and can't have real realationships with adults. Not saying that a 40 year old who's sleeping with a 17 year old is ok, just not actually pedophile, as the 17 year old is no longer pre-pudecent.
Also speaking a someone who lives in Canada. An adult can't have sex with an adult. the age of consent is only for people under 18, when they become a legal adult. So while two 17 year old can have sex a 17 year old and a 30 year old can't. I think some places allow anyone 16 and older to have sex with someone 4 years old, eg a 16 yr old with a 20 year old, but im not sure if thats in the US not Canada.
I have a hard time finding anyone who agrees with any of your posts. Does this not tell you something?
having sex with a 16 year-old is not pedophilia, it's statutary rape. duh. it's only pedophilia if the guy/woman is raping someone who has not entered puberty. Oh, and is this site a joke? i have not seen a more blatant display of ignorance, ever. i think it's so funny, i'm sending it to some people who i think should have a good joke to laugh at. so, i ask again, iIS this site for real? you shouldat least put some references to the pasta monster if you want to create a joke site...
You sure are liberal with your use of the English language. Hanging prepositions are worse than hanging chads.
This is some of the best satire I have come across online. You, sir, are the greatest Poe on the intertubes! Keep 'em coming my brotha!
I really can't tell if this is supposed to be funny or not....
Because, either way, it isn't.
Post a Comment