I'm getting very upset with the way things are going in this country. Barack Obama is out to destroy America and the culture that makes it great. His only desire is to destroy everything that has made America the envy of the world with. He hates our friends and allies around the world because he wants to be friends and allies with the terrorists. I don't think this was the change that Americans thought they were voting for. I knew this was coming, but everyone else is stupid.
The real issue here has to do with how the modern day liberal thinks. I have to take a page from Evan Sayet because he has summed it all up perfectly. If you're unfamiliar with this guy, he was a Jewish Comedian and described himself as a liberal. After 9/11, things changed for him. He became an American Conservativebecause he couldn't figure out why his liberal friends didn't support America. He would hear things from his friends about how maybe America deserved it. Crazy stuff that only liberals and Ron Paul can suggest to people. This is something that really changed him because he just didn't understand.
Basically he wanted to understand why this was the case and he did. It's really an amazing conclusion that he has come up with. The main philosophical point is rooted deeply inside an axiom on multiculturalism. That Axiom is that all cultures are equal. That doesn't sound overly bad because choosing to eat at McDonald's versus a sushi bar isn't that big of a deal. I don't think anyone can say one is better than the other.
The issue comes into play since liberals view indiscriminate is a moral virtue. This where the conflict comes into play. Let's say that America is the best country in the whole world. We have the most prosperity. We have the smartest people. We have amazing technology and the best medicine. A liberal views that statement as a sin. If I'm saying, I'm also saying that all the other countries in the world suck. I'm discriminating against their culture. If I say that American culture is better than the culture in the Middle East, I'm a racist in the eyes of a liberal. You can't that America is any better than Iran because all cultures are equal. It doesn't matter how many facts are on your side.
All of this is subtle, but it is everywhere. Sayet mentioned that Allan Bloom noticed a trend in the 80's with the types of students that were arriving to his University. In the 50's, 60's and 70's students arrived to get the better education. They wanted the better culture. They wanted the better philosophy. But in the 80's, which is when the first kids of the hippy generation got there. Here is the kicker. They came in not wanting the better, but denying the existence of the better.
This is where the whole issues starts. It is this view that moral indiscriminate and that everything is equal that creates the whole problem. This applies to everything. It doesn't matter if it is politics, religion, and views on the world. Saying that Chemotherapy is better than hippy "alternative" methods is a form of discriminating.
But there is more...
Liberals invariably side with Evil over Good, Wrong over Right and the behaviors that lead to failure over the behaviors that lead to success
This is where the real evil of their philosophy raises their ugly head. At this point you should recognize that to say something is good and another thing is evil is a form of discrimination.
9/11 illustrates the point so well. If you logically looked at what happened, the only thing you could conclude is that Muslims hate us. But that is racist. It's a form of discrimination and has to be removed from conscious thought. The idea that they crashed those planes because they hated us can't be a reasonable solution for them. They have to come up with something that is indiscriminate and where it views us as equals.
This is the exact reason why liberals say that we provoked them to attack us. The idea that they just attacked us because they hate us, is just not valid to them. They have to come up with something that justifies it. This is a prime example of a right and wrong conclusion. They side on the wrong.
Here is where the Evil over Good comes into play. It isn't a matter of saying that we provoked them. Playing my music loud in the middle of the night is a form of provoking my neighbor, but that doesn't justify him killing me. What a liberal will do is raise our evil and wrongs to the level of the terrorists. And downplay the evils of the terrorists.
This is the exact reason why you would see liberal journalists describing American soldiers as Nazis. They're not Nazis or anything even closely related, but they have to elevate the evil of America. It is the same reason why George W. Bush was called Hitler. This is how it works.
It follows the same with economic issues. They view their utopia as everyone equal. No one is rich and no one is poor. Indiscriminate and Equal.
To a liberal, the fact that someone is rich, proves the someone is suffering a poor person.
To a liberal, the fact that you're really rich, proves you're making a lot of people poor.
To a liberal, if someone is poor, than that means they're a victim of someone that is rich.
This is the prime reason why you always hear whining about how the rich are getting richer. The fact is that average Joe's can have computers, internet, big screen tv, their own home, their own car, etc. It doesn't matter that the average Joe has so much luxury, it's the fact that someone is rich and that is an injustice.
It is this retarded inane thinking. They don't have the ability to look at something objectively and say "that's good". Evan Sayet has an hour long lecture where he talks about this in detail. You can view it here.
Now that we have a little background on the philosophy that liberals live their life by, we can fully see how Barack Obama is destroying American Culture. I might just run a simple conservative blog, but I know what I'm talking about. If you look at the way that he tries to be buddies with the Muslim world and in turn snubs Israel. It's a joke.
He said he was going to sit down with terrorists and dictators to try and talk with them. Even with Iran's Ahmadinejad snubbed Obama. Obama was looking to talk to him about Nuclear energy and Ahmadinejad said he isn't talking. Nice one Obama. Maybe the dictators and crazy Muslim extremists aren't into talking? Maybe the fact that he denies the holocaust has something to do with his retarded stupidity and he won't want to talk.
Let's just say that you have a serial killer that is insane.He's in a mental institute and you decide to have a friendly conversation with him and just talk him into being a nice person that doesn't kill. Hmmmm, maybe that isn't going to work. Maybe the holocaust denying, wipe Israel off the Earth, crazy lunatic isn't capable of being persuaded through talk.
Consider the fact that he has increased funding to Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Maybe this is the reason that he is buddy-buddy and neighbor to domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. This is where liberals fail and incredibly miss the main points. They view Bush as a world villian because he wouldn't talk with evil fucked up dictators. Maybe he didn't talk with them because they're evil fucked up dictators. I didn't see Bush having a problem talking to the Prime Minister of Canada.
Yet, Obama wants to be buddies with Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Castro, Putin and all the lunatics, dictators, socialists and terrorists around the world.
Being the best country in the world comes with a little thing called standards. We are supposed to only associate with good countries. We should only be inactiving good policies. We shouldn't be trying to suck up and be buddies with the worst countries in the world.
Obama Scraps Missile Shield
Yup, I was actually very upset to hear this. He is cancelling the plan for Europe, which means that our very important allies are getting left out in the dark. A lot of people think that this is something we shouldn't build because this really isn't about protecting America. I'm sorry, but you're real fucking wrong. If it was 1900, I'd agree totally. The problem today is that the world is a lot smaller than it used to be.
We need a presence all over the world and we need to protect specific key allies that allow us to launch massive strikes against our enemies. I swear there are a lot of fuckin' retards that don't understand how war is done when you're half way around the world. You need massive bases to hold troops and equipment. We can't close them all up. We need allies to allow us to use their airspace, so we can launch attacks.
What the fuck are we going to do if the Russians lunch a massive attack on Poland? And don't say it won't happen. They didn't seem to have an issue pushing into Georgia. There are real threats because we lose our own strategic positions. It's no secret that all crazy, lunatic, socialist countries hate America and want to attack it. They're the ones that had citizens dancing in the streets on 9/11. We need to have a presence around the world to stop such things.
Yet again, Obama doesn't get it and that is another reason why he is destroying American culture.
Obama's Health Care Plan
This is what I happen to find the biggest issue here. Free market capitalism is the best. The problems with the health care system are based on government involvement in forcing them to provide most care automatically, even if they won't be paid back. Think of all the illegal immigrants that show up to a hospital and step out on the bill. That's $100,000 here and $500,000 and a hospital has to pay for it some how, so we all pay it.
But some people say why don't we just get universal insurance. Well, isn't that the same as "we all pay it". Look, deregulation of the health care market needs to be done immediately. Think of how things could open up if you could compete with out of state insurance. Such retarded regulations of states were lobbied in because there is absolutely no logical reason to have such a thing in place.
I recently heard that the health care plan is going to contain different types of insurance like gold, silver and bronze. I'm not necessarily opposed to this idea if it is in the private sector. When you think about it, it works. Does a 20 year old need gold insurance? Probably not. You don't need to be paying your health insurer for coverage of lung cancer because you won't have it.
I got very irritated with Obama's speech to congress on health care. Even though Joe Wilson said "you lie" on the illegals getting this free health care. I don't believe that is the case. The thing that irritated me was that he said this program would pay for itself. The public option would survive on it's own premiums. The idea is that if you're not for profit and you have less paper work you'll be able to do that cheaper.
Well, I don't agree. The fact is that if you can't afford the health care, you're going to get it. They talk about fines, but if you can't afford to get it, the fine isn't going to be that big. There is no possible way that premiums will pay for a public option. The reason it can't is that the government is going to have paper work and they're going to have over paid employees running it, instead of having CEOs profiting.
Sure, there won't be the paper work that insurance has to do to prevent fraud. But there will be bureaucratic papers. When you do your taxes, it isn't simple, There's bullshit attached with it and that's what you're going to get. Doctors will have to hire people to handle the bullshit.
There is more logical and smarter things that can be done. Reduce regulation on where you can get insurance. Test out the Obama Health Care Plan on medicare and see what happens. Prove to the American people that it is going to cut costs. These are things that are smart and logical.
A big thing about insurance is just insurance itself. Most of the overhead costs of insurance doesn't have to do with paying the CEO. It's about researching clients and seeing whether they're acting in a fraudalent manner. I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to something that would help insurance companies deal with the issues associated with protecting themselves from fraud.
In the end, whatever system is choosen, we need something that puts accountability into the picture. If you're a fat disgusting lazy bastard that doesn't exercise and eats Big Macs everyday, you should have to pay high premiums. If you're someone that is healthy, exercises and practices good healthy behaviors, you should pay less. I don't like the fact that I am expected to pay the medical bills of people that choose to be negligent with their health.
The Economy is still an Issue
From what I see, the root cause has not even been addressed yet. Remember all the talk on Toxic Assets on the balance sheets of banks and constantly being mentioned on the news. Well, last time I checked they're still there. We just gave them free money to balance their credit structure and to meet regulatory requirements.
Everyone is blaming greedy bankers and their greedy greed greediness to make money. WRONG. This was not created by banks. This was created by Fannie and Freddie. They're the ones that hold the public-private mix. They are traded on the stock market, but they have a charter dictated by Congress.
Mortgage backed securities were created by Fannie and Freddie. They're the ones that made them. You couldn't buy them, if Fannie and Freddie didn't package them up to be sold. The issue that they created was that they guaranteed the mortgages. They told banks that they'd back up the mortgage with a government guarantee if they just let them package it up as a mortgage backed security.
Well, surprise surprise all banks would love to get a guarantee that they're getting paid for a mortgage. It creates a complete moral hazard and that is exactly what Fannie and Freddie created.
But let's not forget that these two government institutions bullied and pushed bankers into giving out loans to people that probably wouldn't pay it back. Fannie and Freddie were there to help out minorties and low income people get in a home. The idea that they held was that houses would go up forever, so if these people defaulted on their loan the bank would get the house and everything would be fine.
Wrong. The housing collapsed and so did the prices. The problem the banks had wasn't the houses. They don't give a crap about the houses because they're guaranteed to them. The houses were still on their bank sheet and they have to meet certain regulatory requirements with capital if they want to give out loans. Since most of the houses went into negative equity, this ate up all their capital and they couldn't loan.
That's the whole issue in a nutshell. Of course this won't change anything. Fannie and Freddie will continue to run and create these mortgage back securities. For example, Canada didn't run into this problem because they don't have a Fannie or Freddie. Banks had to hold onto their mortgages for profit without guarantees, so they had an interest in making sure that people could actually pay back their loans.
The lesson here is not to go after CEO pays or anyone that gets paid period. Fannie and Freddie need to be abolished. Banks should hold onto their mortgages, so they don't end up in a moral hazard like the government created.
This won't happen though.
Unemployement continues to rise, we're losing around 200,000 jobs a month, the government is spending more money than it has ever before. Our deficit is exploding. We're hearing about increased taxes on the rich and on business. We're hearing about public health care and other things that are just going to end up costing us more and more.
All this crap is bad. Barack Obama is destroying America and only the American conservative blogosphere is talking about it.
The Tea Parties
The entire tea party movement is a good thing. People are pissed the fuck off at what is happening to this country and all the spending that is occurring. We don't want government running our health care. We don't want to be in huge debt. We don't want to pay more taxes. We're sick of it all.
Yet, when people go out to protest this, they're labeled as extremists and racists. Not because we are. Remember, the extremists are the ones that crash planes into buildings. Going out for a peaceful protest isn't an extremist move. But at least you know why liberals are saying those things.
You can head over to Huffpo and take a look at all the articles on the tea parties. Absolute hatred of people that are concerned over the direction of this country. And you know the same people would be applauding riots and looting as long as the protesters are fighting against free trade or the Iraq war. Yet, millions of Americans that go out and peacefully protest our government, and we're all extremists.
All I know is that I'm pissed off with the way things are going. Obama is taking this country in the wrong direction. He wants us to work hard to supplicate ourselves to our enemies. He wants us to not defend our country and our interest. He wants to destroy our health care system. He wants to keep our economy weak and he doesn't like it when people protest him.
It's a sad day for America.
Christmas is supposed to be one of the most important days of the year for people. Jesus Christ, our lord and savor, died for our sins and this is our way to give back to Him.
